From the May 2017 IBDP Paper 2 History Exam
The economic policies of democratic states significantly impact their societies, shaping socio-economic dynamics and affecting diverse aspects of citizens' lives. This essay will explore and contrast the impacts of the economic policies implemented in the United States and the United Kingdom during the late 20th century. With particular reference to Reaganomics and Thatcherism, two periods marked by significant shifts towards neoliberal economic models, the societal implications, from income inequality to changes in public services, will be scrutinised. The interpretations of Piketty, Harvey, and Skidelsky, renowned economic thinkers, will serve as guideposts to the analysis. By juxtaposing these two contexts, this essay aims to elucidate the broader patterns of how economic policies in democratic states reverberate through their societies, often in profound and enduring ways.
Reaganomics in the United States offers a vivid illustration of the impact of economic policies on society. Instituted under President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, Reaganomics entailed significant tax cuts, deregulation, and reductions in government spending. Its ideological underpinnings rested on supply-side economics, positing that reducing barriers for businesses and the wealthy would spur economic growth that would trickle down to the broader populace. Piketty argued that Reaganomics' biggest societal impact was exacerbating income inequality. His meticulous examination of tax records reveals that the wealthiest Americans' income share markedly increased during the 1980s, while real wages for the middle and lower classes stagnated. Piketty attributes this widening inequality to Reagan's tax cuts, which disproportionately benefited the rich, coupled with the curtailing of welfare programs that disproportionately affected the economically disadvantaged. These policies, he asserts, rewrote the social contract, diminishing state intervention in wealth redistribution and placing greater onus on market outcomes to determine individuals' economic fortunes. Moreover, Reagan's deregulation policies influenced society in complex ways. Piketty claims that the deregulation of industries and financial markets fuelled a surge in the financialisation of the American economy. This financialisation led to wealth accumulation in the hands of a few, as Piketty reveals, whilst also altering the societal perception of wealth creation and the role of financial institutions in society. Contrarily, Harvey views Reaganomics as part of the broader rise of neoliberalism, a global economic shift. He posits that the economic policies did not merely reflect a series of national policy choices but embodied a broader ideological change, privileging market mechanisms over state intervention across various sectors of society. This shift, Harvey notes, was accompanied by a change in societal values, with greater emphasis on individual responsibility and entrepreneurship.
Harvey's analysis links Reaganomics to the privatisation of public services, citing the shift from state to private management as a primary example of neoliberalism's societal influence. This alteration, according to him, generated profound changes in American society, with individuals increasingly dependent on the market for services previously provided by the state. Access to resources like healthcare and education became stratified based on wealth, reinforcing the inequality observed by Piketty. Both Piketty and Harvey's insights illuminate the way Reaganomics ushered in societal changes beyond the economic realm, extending to the core aspects of social services, societal values, and the distribution of wealth and power. The supply-side economics at the heart of Reaganomics, coupled with neoliberal ideals, initiated shifts in the societal fabric that persisted long after Reagan's presidency, underlining the potency of economic policies in influencing societal dynamics.
Parallel to Reaganomics, the United Kingdom's Thatcherism under Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s marked another profound turn towards neoliberal economic policies. These policies included tax reductions, privatisation of state-owned industries, deregulation, and a focus on controlling inflation over unemployment. Thatcherism's societal impact was significant, as noted by Skidelsky. He contends that the greatest societal repercussion was the deepening socio-economic divide, primarily a result of the privatisation of state-owned industries. This privatisation led to a severe decline in manufacturing jobs, especially in the North and in Scotland, which Skidelsky emphasises had not only an economic but a deep-seated societal impact. As whole communities were built around these industries, their loss led to widespread unemployment, resulting in social issues such as increased crime and health problems. Consequently, a geographic divide became evident, with the South-East, driven by a booming financial sector in London, becoming wealthier while regions reliant on manufacturing faced economic decline and societal upheaval. Moreover, Skidelsky illustrates how Thatcher's staunch stance against trade unions, culminating in the Miners' Strike of 1984-85, had far-reaching societal implications. The weakening of the unions not only tipped the balance of power towards employers in the workforce, but also signalled a societal shift in how workers' rights and collective bargaining were perceived, setting the tone for future industrial relations. Simultaneously, Harvey views Thatcherism as a component of the global rise of neoliberalism. He underscores how this economic shift to prioritising market forces over state intervention led to changes in societal values, much like in the United States under Reagan. According to Harvey, the promotion of individual responsibility and entrepreneurship led to a societal transition towards more market-driven values, impacting societal norms and structures.
The societal shifts highlighted by Harvey became particularly visible in the realm of public services in the United Kingdom. Privatisation extended to crucial sectors like housing and utilities, resulting in increased prices and often decreased accessibility for the economically disadvantaged. These changes led to a growing divide in access to basic amenities based on wealth, reinforcing the socio-economic division underscored by Skidelsky. Moreover, Thatcher's tax policies, particularly the controversial 'poll tax' that imposed a flat-rate tax on every adult, were seen to disproportionately burden the poorer sections of society. This not only widened income disparities, as Piketty noted in the United States, but also led to widespread public protests, underscoring the societal impact of economic policy decisions. These perspectives from Skidelsky and Harvey demonstrate how Thatcherism, much like Reaganomics, brought significant societal changes, manifesting in socio-economic disparities, transformations in public services, and shifts in societal values. The echoes between these two contexts underline the broader societal patterns instigated by economic policies in democratic states.
The comparison between the societal impact of Reaganomics and Thatcherism provides valuable insights into how economic policies shape society in democratic states. Notably, both regimes exhibited a shared neoliberal philosophy, favouring market forces over state intervention, and both resulted in significant socio-economic divisions. Piketty, Harvey, and Skidelsky’s evaluations intersect on the observation that both the United States and the United Kingdom saw a widening of income inequality as a result of these economic policies. Piketty's analysis of American tax records parallels Skidelsky's assessment of the UK's socio-economic divide, reinforcing that these policies did not result in the intended 'trickle-down' effects. Instead, wealth became increasingly concentrated at the top, leading to economic imbalances that had far-reaching societal implications. This pattern of income inequality was not just a coincidence but a systemic outcome of the neoliberal policies adopted. The parallels observed extend beyond economic inequality. As Harvey notes, both the United States and the United Kingdom experienced a shift in societal values towards market-oriented principles. Individual responsibility and entrepreneurship were glorified, while collective bargaining and welfare programs were viewed less favourably. This ideological shift was a shared characteristic of the Reagan and Thatcher era, underlining how economic policies can fundamentally transform societal values.
Both nations saw a significant privatisation of public services during these periods, again echoing the overarching neoliberal philosophy. Harvey's critique of the shift from state to market in public services can be applied to both contexts. In the United States, this resulted in a market-driven stratification of resources, while in the United Kingdom, it led to increased prices and decreased accessibility for the less privileged. These changes had societal implications, altering the nature of access to basic amenities and reinforcing socio-economic divides. Moreover, the weakening of trade unions in both nations pointed to another societal shift in the power dynamics between labour and capital, with Skidelsky's analysis of the UK context reflecting similar trends in the United States. This move not only affected workers' rights and employment conditions but also led to a broader societal shift in the perception of collective bargaining. In sum, the societal impact of Reaganomics and Thatcherism demonstrates how economic policies in democratic states can drive significant transformations, from income distribution and societal values to the balance of power between capital and labour.
The analysis of Reaganomics in the United States and Thatcherism in the United Kingdom underscores the far-reaching societal implications of economic policies in democratic states. Not only do these policies direct economic activities, but they also shape societal structures, values, and power dynamics. Both Piketty's examination of the United States and Skidelsky's analysis of the United Kingdom demonstrate a shared outcome of these neoliberal policies: the widening of socio-economic divides. The intended 'trickle-down' effect of wealth did not materialise; instead, wealth became increasingly concentrated at the top, leading to societal imbalances that extended beyond mere economics. Moreover, Harvey's critique of the shift from state to market control of public services illuminated how these policies transformed access to resources like healthcare, education, and basic utilities. The market-based stratification of these resources brought about societal changes that were not limited to the economy, affecting access to fundamental services and thus the quality of life for individuals. The analysis also revealed how these policies reshaped societal values and perceptions. The emphasis on individual responsibility and entrepreneurship, coupled with a devaluation of collective bargaining and state welfare programs, signalled a significant ideological shift in society. In conclusion, the impact of economic policies on society extends beyond the realm of the economy. As demonstrated by the era of Reaganomics and Thatcherism, these policies can bring profound societal transformations, shaping societal structures, values, and power dynamics in the process. Therefore, in evaluating economic policies, it is crucial to consider their societal repercussions as well as their economic outcomes.
Sample student essay written under exam conditions:
