Highlights from Drake's first visit to London
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb266/eb2663a28a4a66eb464f0061fbb635419a92a2a9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8481/a84814543154797ffe407650bfe87f884355cb84" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74578/7457809066ddb3ffb0339f3a9afcc00ec253e3e9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/946ba/946baaf0d7fe1a051c947293115f8d16a00a2d66" alt=""
Trinity Place, immediately by the main entrance to the Tower Hill Circle and District line underground station dating from 200 CE, and Drake and beside the version in Rome in front of Trajan's Market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ebdf/6ebdf8f9696da79c6852ab9c99bcd40ae6eefef3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2537/d25377472db9643b0461d2236dcc1163ff410ba0" alt=""
Drake overlooking London within the London Eye
In front of Nelson's column on the left, ten years apart.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/796cb/796cbfbeacbd063c795759b3cbc636bf14bc6a9d" alt=""
Natural History Museum
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36ade/36adef1e90ee8b1236d97ffaab39f329546894da" alt=""
Temple Church
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5cfb/e5cfbc7e210e7dd987c3ee337bf3cd0ff548d90b" alt=""
Drake beside the tomb of William Marshal, the "best knight that ever lived," damaged during the war. Caught on the wrong side of the civil war and condemned by his father to the gallows at age five, William Marshal defied all the odds to become England’s most celebrated knight. Born
in 1147, he was used as a hostage by his father and King Stephen at
just five years of age during the Civil War. Most historians agree that it
was William’s charm, as well as the personality of King Stephen, that
kept him alive until the end of hostilities in 1153. A leading retainer of five English kings, Marshal served the great figures of this age, from Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine to Richard the Lionheart and his infamous brother John, and was involved in some of the most critical phases of medieval history, from the Magna Carta to the survival of the Angevin/Plantagenet dynasty. After
being wounded in an ambush in 1168 he was ransomed by none other than
Eleanor of Aquitaine, queen of Henry II, which began his lifelong
association with the royal dynasty. For much of Henry’s reign his sons
and queen conspired against him, and he against them. So for William to
have served five kings in this family was no small achievement. As
a young man, William made his living as a tournament knight where, in
addition to earning wealth and fame across Europe, he became skilled in
combat and the laws of chivalry. In fact 2001's A Knight’s Tale starring Heath Ledger was inspired by William’s early life.
Drake beside a painting of the effigies as they appeared immediately after the church was bombed and at the same site. After fighting in the Holy Land, William returned to service with Henry II during several conflicts with the king’s sons. He was famous for having killed Richard the Lionheart’s horse from under him- Marshal could have despatched Richard too had he chosen to do so. Despite, or perhaps because of this, Richard took William into his service after the death of Henry. William was one of the people Richard trusted to guard his kingdom from his younger brother John when he went on crusade. Marshal’s loyalty to this royal family continued after the death of Richard when he supported John as King of England. Although the two had a very volatile relationship, since John trusted no one, William stayed loyal once again to his king throughout the First Barons’ War and the sealing of Magna Carta in 1215. On John’s death, William was nominated to act as Regent to John’s son: the nine-year-old King Henry III. His great experience in battle was key to beating the French at the 1217 Battle of Lincoln. Marshal led his army to victory in Lincoln resulting in winning the First Barons’ War for King Henry III and resisting the French invasion. Marshal’s link with the royals lasted beyond his death in 1219. Although his sons died without any children, through one of his daughters’ children Marshal was related to the last Plantagenet kings - from Edward IV to Richard III - and all English monarchs from Henry VIII onwards.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0898/c08989cc9370f40eb6dea037ecca61a2c15ab371" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d85/71d85b8046820277ba35d0abe70613a363bf26d6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0898/c08989cc9370f40eb6dea037ecca61a2c15ab371" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d85/71d85b8046820277ba35d0abe70613a363bf26d6" alt=""
Outside Sir Winston Churchill's house at 28 Hyde Park Gate where he lived from 1945 and would eventually die in 1965. Shown is Churchill waving from a window on the eve of his 90th birthday in 1964 with a crowd of well-wishers, photographers and cameramen outside. In front of the door is shown Churchill's private detective, Edward Murray, conferring with a uniformed constable when it had been reported that Drake Winston's namesake was feeling unwell after a cold, dying a week later.
Others who lived on this same street include Virginia Woolf, Sir Jacob Epstein, and Robert Baden-Powell whose statue outside the Scouts headquarters was fortunately still standing before BLM thugs and other assorted fascists could desecrate it.
Wembley Stadium
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d8ff/3d8fffffa0f97155de7c1bf81c0aab7505604316" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58be3/58be341d6b3fd299f3e310a269fd276deb519888" alt=""
Built by Edward I to provide a water gate entrance to the Tower, Traitors' Gate became an entrance through which many prisoners of the Tudors arrived at the Tower of London. Its name was given before 1543, when that name is used on Anton van den Wyngaerde's panorama of London. Prisoners were brought by barge along the Thames, passing under London Bridge, where the heads of recently executed prisoners were displayed on spikes. Notable prisoners such as Sir Thomas More entered the Tower by Traitors' Gate. Although Anne Boleyn is often reported to have passed through the Traitors' Gate after her arrest, the contemporary chronicle of Charles Wriothesley recorded that Boleyn was brought through the "court gate" in the Byward Tower.
British Museum
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e0c1/4e0c13954998ef4b19b0d9db9c0c950347935534" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37a60/37a60ddc56b7b9fe8678b115d875e2bec3e54bfc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307d0/307d0baa63ddddb2ad00bbe729fb81957ee986b9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31e45/31e45a8fe07f2740e47f466bfb21fc6d461736d6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05c26/05c26c3ac5f20c00fd0e8143df9f917595d3b5b2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3e0b/c3e0b3785d8fceadd410e12ab4c872037b9be668" alt=""
Roman
marble bust of the emperor Antoninus Pius in military dress dating to
about 140 CE, from the house of Jason Magnus, a prominent citizen of
Cyrene, North Africa, now in Room 70.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/909ee/909ee80934ef81c068f2c944b4f67951a246cdbf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7390/f7390fe04111d09706262f547dfa04fbe1b4f179" alt=""
Mausolus is familiar to us, the islanders of the north, who possess in our capital the genuine portraits of himself and his queen. The British colossal statue which was made, at latest, soon after his death, presents a man of a noble cast of face, of a type presumably Carian, certainly not Greek, and with the hair curiously brushed back from the brow. This statue stood, along with that of Artemisia, within the sepulchral tomb which he probably began and which she certainly completed.
Artemisia herself is renowned in history for her extraordinary grief at the death of her husband (and brother) Mausolus, being said to have mixed his ashes in her daily drink, and to have gradually pined away during the two years that she survived him. She induced the most eminent Greek rhetoricians to proclaim his praise in their oratory; and to perpetuate his memory she built at Halicarnassus the celebrated Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, listed by Antipater of Sidon as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World and whose name subsequently became the generic term for any remarkable sepulchral monument. When Rhodes objected to the fact that a woman was ruling Caria, it sent a fleet against Artemisia without knowing that her deceased husband had built a secret harbour. Artemisia hid ships rowers, and marines and allowed the Rhodians to enter the main harbour. Artemisia and her citizens met the Rhodians at the city walls and invited them into the city. When the Rhodians began exiting their ships, Artemisia sailed her fleet through an outlet in the sea and into the main harbour, capturing empty Rhodian ships, and the Rhodian men who disembarked were killed in the marketplace. Artemisia then put her men on the Rhodian ships and had them sail back to Rhodes. The men were welcomed in the Rhodian harbour whereupon they took over Rhodes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14866/148662504135d4e41377eeccbf184448d1eb0283" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4748/e47482de978a3c2291da2548c8259a3c827df28b" alt=""
Drake beside the fantastic bust of Caracalla, and reimagined as he would have apeared in life.
Drake in front of the outstanding Meroë bust and beside a copy a month earlier in Munich. This head of the emperor Augustus was originally part of a statue in Egypt. The Romans used statues to remind the empire's largely illiterate population of the power of the emperor. The head was decapitated by an invading army from Meroë in modern-day Sudan. They buried the head under the temple steps as an insult to Augustus. Ironically, it was this act of defiance that preserved the head. Whilst conducting excavations for the University of Liverpool in 1910, much to his surprise, John Garstang found this classical statue head buried beneath the threshold of a temple in the Kushite royal city of Meroë. In antiquity, those entering or leaving the temple would have purposefully trod on Augustus’ head in the process, an insulting act calculated to demonstrate as much contempt and derision towards him as possible. The Meroë Head is larger than life-size and mimics Greek art by portraying Augustus with classical proportions; it was clearly designed to idealise and flatter the Emperor. This was the case for most Augustan portraiture, especially the earliest, which evoked both youthfulness and the long-admired Grecian techniques of depicting young men. Made of bronze, the eyes are inset with glass pupils and calcite irises. It is the preservation of the eyes (which are frequently lost in ancient bronze statues) which makes this statue so startlingly realistic. The emperor's head turns to his right and gazes powerfully into the distance. His hair falls onto his brow in waves that are typical of Augustus's portraits. The British Museum has several other notable bronze heads of Roman Emperors including an image of Claudius. The heads are thought to have been made locally but based on moulds created in Rome. The Meroë Head was the 35th object in A History of the World in 100 Objects, a BBC Radio 4 series first broadcast in 2010, which traces the story of human civilisation through 100 iconic objects chosen from the collection of the British Museum.Throughout his adult life, Caracalla wore his hair and beard clipped short, in the manner of a soldier on campaign rather than the longer hair and full beards affected by emperors since the time of Hadrian. That change in fashion easily distinguished his portraits from those of his immediate predecessors. His distinctive coin profiles, with their identifying inscriptions, made the recognition of his sculptural portraits quite easy, and those portraits have extraordinary visual power. After the assassination of Geta left Caracalla in sole control of the empire, his likenesses adopted a dramatic facial expression: a menacing frown and emphatic turn of the head, which suggests that the emperor has just noticed and turned toward a potential enemy. Viewers who meet the intense gaze of the narrow, deep-set eyes cannot help but feel themselves the object of this menacing attention.Caracalla's heavy eyebrows contract strongly, vertical and horizontal creases distort his forehead, the muscle over his eyebrows bulges in a prominent V shape, often defined by jagged furrows on each side that resemble lightning bolts, and his coarse lips pull taut into a grimace, emphasized by the deep naso-labial furrows on each side. Far from attempting to endear the ruler to the general public, these images exemplify the expression oderint dum metuunt, “let them hate me so long as they fear me." They also demonstrate that despite his rebellion against his father, he took one piece of paternal advice to heart. Severus, on his death bed, had told his sons, “Be harmonious, enrich the soldiers, and scorn all other men." The first piece of advice they both ignored, but for the remainder of his rule, Caracalla assiduously courted the support of his army, not only with financial generosity but with a public image designed to persuade them that he was one of their own. His young but weather-beaten and energetic face conveys a toughness acquired through experience on the battlefield.
Susan Wood (297) Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d644a/d644ad59c36a2d5ba016c4ffebfb0f4f66ad636f" alt=""
[t]he current display in the Duveen Gallery represents a predictably awkward compromise between these two different imperatives. The sheer vastness of the gallery space signals the cultural and artistic importance of the works of art housed within it; no visitor could fail to see that they were supposed to admire. Context, history and casts (now including a hands-on display for the blind) are part of the show, but firmly relegated to two side-rooms next to the main entrance; they are not to encroach on the original marbles. The layout of the gallery does indeed gesture towards the architectural coherence of the monument itself: the pediments stand at each end of the room; the frieze runs around the central space (albeit turned ‘inside out’, to face inwards rather than outwards, as it did in its original position). But the real trick of the arrangement is to present the Elgin Marbles as if they were a complete set. Casual observers would never guess that a substantial section of the frieze still remained in Athens. And, if the architect’s original plans had been followed, they would hardly have noticed that much of the east pediment was missing either. It was only the purists among the museum staff who insisted on leaving a tell-tale gap on the plinths to mark where the key central figures had been lost. Overall the effect (and the intention) of the gallery design is to efface what remains in Athens. If the earlier regimes of display repeatedly and explicitly referred the viewer to the monument in Greece and its surviving sculpture, the Duveen effect is to squeeze that memory out. The Elgin Marbles are here meant to stand for the Parthenon itself.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86119/8611983a52646e77c7e9f3c544c55040f44f590e" alt=""
Section of the 1819 painting by Archibald Archer depicting the exhibition of the Elgin marbles in their first, temporary space in the British Museum. The American painter Benjamin West and the director of the British Museum library, Joseph Planta, appear seated in armchairs on the left. The metopes are displayed high on the wall, and the running frieze is displayed at eye level. Drake is sitting next to the statue of Dionysus from the eastern pediment situated in the centre of the room, along with the head of a horse from Selene’s carriage. The artist, Archibald Archer, included himself in the painting, sketching on the bottom right. Another painter, Benjamin Haydon, recorded an opening-day visit in his diary on May 28, 1817: "We overheard two common looking decent men say to each other, 'How broken they are, a'ant they?' 'Yes,' said the other, 'but how like-life.'" Elgin
had applied to the Turkish authorities and in 1801 received a letter of
permission for this work, generally referred to as a firman, which was
probably legal (at that time). As the noted author and Germanophile Neil Macgregor (and incidentally director of the British Museum), told the Evening Standard: "Elgin rescued some of the greatest things ever made, so the world can enjoy them. The greatest things in the world should be... shared and enjoyed by as many people in as many countries as possible."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e9e2/4e9e2dbc951fca3a862eb1ac252bb9c5d81ff414" alt=""
Why does no cast appear in the museologically inconsistent installation of the Erechtheion maidens? Is it because the British Museum's Kore C is so much better preserved that any full-scale cast would expose the poor condition of the Athens statues? The Parthenon east pediment's display of horse heads from Selene's chariot, for instance, sadly juxtaposes eroded originals with a contrasting cast of the British Museum's well-preserved specimen. Yet, while the museum's didactic materials repeatedly shake a finger at villainous Lord Elgin, they do not make generally clear to visitors the still-declining condition of the sculpture on the Acropolis between Greek independence in 1832 and the removal of (most) sculpture during the late 20th century. Unbecomingly, they neither accept nor admit any Greek responsibility for negative effects of prolonged neglect and inaction. Visiting the highly politicised Acropolis Museum invites museum visitors to reflect on the other side of the story.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/898af/898af6eed8f614c22979bedb25c50ecc8ebdb8e6" alt=""
Elgin was among the first to perceive that imperiled architectural sculptures must be removed from their original outdoor contexts. Moreover, he was the first to take actionfor the sake of conservation, and he did so at great personal expense. Yes, in the early 19th century, he removed archaeological material from its place of origin, and his team damaged the monument in the process (including cutting frieze blocks into slabs), which the Greeks emphasise exclusively. It is incontrovertible, however, that, had they remained on the Acropolis until the late 20th century, the sculptures carried off by Elgin would have been gravely damaged. Instead of continuing to attack Elgin, perhaps he ought now be hailed as an unwitting visionary with regard to documentation, preservation, and also display of antiquities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b124b/b124bd30b41e63cc1419f29bbc833c4fd408fb6e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0baf/e0baffc7b02c5a04dc58fb562a640070c1a6ec64" alt=""
Drake
with her sisters at the Athens Archaeological Museum and at the actual
site (showing how much restoration has been applied to the Erechteum).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92797/92797eef1a461a5ef78fe0df52de98196839703f" alt=""
By 1866 the collection consisted of roughly ten thousand objects as antiquities from excavations started to come to the museum in the latter part of the 19th century through the work of the Egypt Exploration Fund under the efforts of E.A. Wallis Budge. Over the years more than 11,000 objects came from this source, including pieces from Amarna, Bubastis and Deir el-Bahari. Other organisations and individuals also excavated and donated objects to the British Museum, including Flinders Petrie's Egypt Research Account and the British School of Archaeology in Egypt, as well as the University of Oxford Expedition to Kawa and Faras in Sudan. Active support by the museum for excavations in Egypt continued to result in important acquisitions throughout the 20th century until changes in antiquities laws in Egypt led to the suspension of policies allowing finds to be exported, although divisions still continue in Sudan. The British Museum conducted its own excavations in Egypt where it received divisions of finds, including Asyut (1907), Mostagedda and Matmar (1920s), Ashmunein (1980s) and sites in Sudan such as Soba, Kawa and the Northern Dongola Reach (1990s). The size of the Egyptian collections now stand at over 110,000 objects. In autumn 2001 the eight million objects forming the museum's permanent collection were further expanded by the addition of six million objects from the Wendorf Collection of Egyptian and Sudanese Prehistory. These were donated by Professor Fred Wendorf, comprising the entire collection of artefacts and environmental remains from his excavations at Prehistoric sites in the Sahara Desert between 1963 and 1997. The seven permanent Egyptian galleries at the British Museum, which include its largest exhibition space, can display only 4% of its Egyptian holdings. The second-floor galleries have a selection of the museum's collection of 140 mummies and coffins, the largest outside Cairo. A high proportion of the collection comes from tombs or contexts associated with the cult of the dead, and it is these pieces, in particular the mummies, that remain among the most eagerly sought-after exhibits by visitors to the museum.
Drake beside one of the jewels of the British Museum's collection, the Rosetta stone. On the left and right edges of the slab are written "Captured in Egypt by the British Army in 1801" and "Presented by King George III". During a military expedition on the eve of the land battle of Aboukir in 1799, Captain Bouchard, as a consequence of prebattle trenching at Rosette, came across the famous stone bearing inscriptions in two languages and three kinds of writing: hieroglyphic, demotic, and Greek. The importance of this find was immediately understood by scholars. England confiscated the stone after the Eastern Army surrendered to them, and however unfortunate this loss was for French scholars, it was no hindrance to Jean-Francois champollion. Working from a copy of the stone, in 1822 he established the foundations for deciphering hieroglyphic writing. Before the end of 1802, the stone was transferred to the British Museum, where it is located today. The museum was concerned about heavy bombing in London towards the end of the Great War in 1917, and the Rosetta Stone was moved to safety, along with other portable objects of value. The stone spent the next two years fifty feet below ground level in a station of the Postal Tube Railway at Mount Pleasant near Holborn. Other than during wartime, the Rosetta Stone has left the British Museum only once: for one month in October 1972, to be displayed alongside Champollion's Lettre at the Louvre in Paris on the 150th anniversary of the letter's publication. Even when the Rosetta Stone was undergoing conservation measures in 1999, the work was done in the gallery so that it could remain visible to the public.
The main inspiration for the famous Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, the Nereid Monument was a sculptured tomb from Xanthos in Lycia (then part of the Achaemenid Persian Empire). The monument is thought to have stood until the Byzantine era, and eventually destroyed by Christians. The ruins were rediscovered by
British traveller Charles Fellows in the early 1840s. Fellows's immediate conclusion was that the monument was to Harpagus, who
is the main figure in Lycian history recorded by Herodotus, placing it
in the 6th century BCE although given the style
of the architecture and sculpture, it is now generally believed that the tomb in fact dates from around 390 to 380 BCE, and was
probably the tomb of Arbinas. Fellows arranged for the shipping of
the remains to the British Museum. Without detailed records of where
each item was found, the Museum had to rely on expedition drawings,
marks on the stones, and the composition and style of the sculpture to
estimate how the blocks and sculptures fit together. The current
reconstruction of the East façade in the museum dates from 1969. It is
in room 17 of the Museum, which also houses many other parts of the
monument. According to Melanie Michailidis, despite bearing a "Greek
appearance", the Nereid Monument, the Harpy Tomb and the Tomb of Payava
were built according main Zoroastrian criteria "by being composed of
thick stone, raised on plinths off the ground, and having single
windowless chambers". data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0150e/0150e25885b2796737e5cae12e2b507811d9ca18" alt=""
Victoria and Albert Museum
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/088c3/088c3228cca1fd8e210205c9a0f968864bc95ca3" alt=""
Large,
modern exhibition rooms in the newly built Museum offered an ideal
space in which to display the gigantic five metre high figure, and the
cast was given a prominent position in a gallery comprising Italian art.
When the museum opened four months later in June 1857, students,
artists and craftsman flocked to the museum to admire Papi's faithful
copy of Michelangelo's masterpiece. In 1873, when the new Architectural
Courts (today's Cast Courts) were constructed, David was moved to the
East Court where he has been on display ever since. A few years later he
was moved to the other end of the gallery, and in 2012 he was moved to a
more prominent position in the central axis as seen here. When Victoria
first encountered the cast of David at the Museum, she was apparently
so shocked by his nudity that a proportionally accurate fig leaf was
commissioned to cover the genitalia. The leaf was kept in readiness for
any royal visits, when it was hung on the figure using two strategically
placed hooks. The original fig leaf, made by Papi, has since been lost
but the V&A has a version made in 1857 in their collection.
National Gallery
Drake in front of Paolo Uccello's The Battle of Sant'Egidio as it appears in my copy of A.J. Grant's Outlines of European History. Also referred to as The Battle of San Romano,
it is a set of three paintings depicting events that took place at the
Battle of San Romano between Florentine and Sienese forces in 1432.
They are significant as revealing the development of linear perspective
in early Italian Renaissance painting, and are unusual as a major
secular commission. The paintings are in egg tempera on wooden panels,
each over three metres long. According to the National Gallery, the
panels were commissioned by a member of the Bartolini Salimbeni family
in Florence sometime between 1435 and 1460. The paintings were much
admired in the 15th century; Lorenzo de' Medici so coveted them that he
purchased one and had the remaining two forcibly removed to the Palazzo
Medici. They are now divided between three collections, the National
Gallery, the Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence, and the Musée du Louvre,
Paris. They may represent different times of day: dawn (London), mid-day
(Florence) and dusk (Paris) – the battle lasted eight hours. In this
London painting, Niccolò da Tolentino, with his large gold and red
patterned hat, is seen leading the Florentine cavalry. He had a
reputation for recklessness, and doesn't even wear a helmet, though he
sent two messengers (the departure of the two messengers, shown in the
centre) to tell his allied army of Attendolo to hurry to his aid as he
is facing a superior force. In the foreground, broken lances and a dead
soldier are carefully aligned to create an impression of perspective.
Like a tapestry, the landscape rises up in a picture plane as opposed to
receding deeply into space. This illusion of a backdrop and a
perspective theme resembling a stage, depicts the war as a theatrical
ceremony. The three paintings were designed to be hung high on three
different walls of a room, and the perspective designed with that height
in mind, which accounts for many apparent anomalies in the perspective
when seen in photos or at normal gallery height. The panels were a
subject in the BBC series The Private Life of a Masterpiece (2005).
In front of Turner's The Fighting Temeraire,
depicting the ship being tugged to her last berth to be broken up.
Painted in 1838, it shows the 98-gun HMS Temeraire, one of the last
second-rate ships of the line to have played a role in the Battle of
Trafalgar, being towed up the Thames by a paddle-wheel steam tug in
1838, towards its final berth in Rotherhithe to be broken up for scrap.
In a poll organised by BBC Radio 4's Today programme in 2005, it was
voted the nation's favourite painting. The beauty of the old warship is
in stark contrast to the dirty blackened tugboat with its tall
smokestack, which scurries across the still surface of the river. The
Sun setting symbolises the end of an epoch in the history of the British
Royal Navy. Behind Temeraire, a gleaming sliver of the waxing Moon
casts a silvery beam across the river, symbolising the commencement of
the new, industrial era. The demise of heroic strength is the subject of
the painting, and it has been suggested that the ship stands for the
artist himself, with an accomplished and glorious past but now
contemplating his mortality. Turner called the work his "darling", which
may have been due to its beauty, or his identification with the
subject. Turner had taken some artistic licence with the painting. The
ship was known to her crew as "Saucy", rather than "Fighting" Temeraire.
Before being sold to the ship-breaker John Beatson, the ship had been
lying at Sheerness Dockyard, and was then moved to his wharf at
Rotherhithe, then in Surrey but now in Southwark. Her masts and rigging
had already been removed before her sale and journey to the breaker's
yard. All of her cannon, anchors and assorted hardware had been removed
and salvaged for the navy to use as spare parts. She was towed by two
tugboats, not just one, and in the other direction (the sun sets in the
west, while the Thames estuary is at the river's eastern end). In 2020
the painting was included on the new £20 note as seen here.
In front of Piero di Cosimo's Satyr Mourning over a Nymph
which, according to the gallery's guidebook, depicts the death of
Procris, daughter of the king of Athens, who was accidentally killed by
her husband Cephalus during a deer hunt. Several inconsistencies between
the depiction and the actual myth have been noted such as the absence
both of her husband- being mourned instead by a faun rather than her
husband- and the deadly spear as well as the unusual location of her
wounds. Recently it has been posited that there is a darker side to the
painting. Michael Baum, one of Britain's leading cancer experts and a
keen art critic, argues that it does not depict the accidental death that Ovid wrote about but rather "is a painting about a murder, and a
very nasty one at that." He focuses on her hands, both of which "are
covered with deep lacerations. There is only one way she could have got
those. She has been trying to fend off an attacker who has come at her,
slashing in a frenzied manner with a knife or possibly a sword.
Certainly there is no way that a spear could have done that." Further
clues include the woman's left hand which is bent backward, in a
position known by surgeons as "the waiter's tip", typical of someone who
has received a serious injury at points C3 and C4 on the cervical cord.
The severing at these points causes nerve damage that makes the wrist
flex and the fingers curl up in the manner of a waiter taking a
backhanded tip. Intriguingly, Cosimo may still have been trying to
depict the death of Procris and may simply have been the victim of his
own acute observational powers. "I think he may well have gone to a
mortuary and asked to be allowed to paint the body of a young woman and
got the body of one who had been murdered by knife – and so he
faithfully put on to his canvas what he saw..." This site however calls such an interpretation into question.
At the Imperial War Museum in Southwark and when members of the cast of the TV series Dad’s Army visited in 1974. The
Imperial War Museum in London was founded in 1917 to collect andhouse
records of the Great War. It opened in June 1920 in Crystal Palace,
Sydenham, moving in 1924 to South Kensington. It was eventually
installed in Bethlem Hospital, Lambeth, in 1936, and its collections
were doubled by the Second World War. Between 1989 and 1992, with more
recent wars added to its remit, it was refurbished as a populist and
vividly-accessible museum, suitable for a family outing. It's the
largest and most prominent institution in an enormous range spanning
regimental museums, local authority collections and local or private
initiatives to preserve memorabilia and document a specific war
experience.
There
is concern that when the Imperial War Museum insists on rebranding
itself 'new', it effaces its own history, including, for example, its
original justification in 1917 as a museum founded to commemorate 'the
war to end all wars' - a rationale that weakened and collapsed in the
1930s with the rise of fascism and the growing prospect of another world
war. As to what the Museum now offers or means, a former Director
recently declared it "perhaps the most comprehensive museum of the
twentieth century in existence", aiming to leave one, according to the
guidebook, to draw one's own conclusions. However, there is criticism
that its installation clearly implies that pre-1914 was a lost golden
age, thereby reinforcing the idea that the war involved transition from
innocence to experience. Not only does this repress how much the
Edwardian period was riven by class struggle, problems in Ireland, the
militancy of the Suffragettes and even imminent revolution, it also fits
in with the terms of nineteenth-century evolutionary thought, promoting
a vision of war as an unequivocal moving forward or backward in the
life of the nation. Regardless, it implies that the years 1914-1918
might be comprehended in a single and all-encompassing point of view.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51664/51664c85b1a5c2533cd77e20491674fb93086ce1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/681c1/681c12d74faeb9c5ecdccc72138b98cc40c2841c" alt=""
Drake in front of the Cutty Sark, the pinnacle of clipper ship design and was one of the fastest ships of its day. It achieved remarkably fast passage times under her Master Richard Woodget, and became the dominant ship in bringing wool from Australia to England. Launched on 22 November 1869 in Dumbarton, Scotland, it embarked on its maiden voyage from London to Shanghai on 16 February 1870. On its first voyage, Cutty Sark carried ‘large amounts of wine, spirits and beer’, and came back from Shanghai loaded with 1.3 million pounds of tea. It had been built to last for just thirty years but served as a working ship for fifty-two years, a training ship for twenty-two years and has been open to visitors in Maritime Greenwich for sixty years. Cutty Sark was built for the China tea trade but would carry a vast array of cargoes during its career. Cutty Sark carried almost 10 million lbs of tea between 1870 and 1877. The opening of the Suez Canal marked the end for sailing ships in the tea trade and so Cutty Sark had to find new employ. It transported a variety of cargoes, including over 10,000 tons of coal, before finding its calling in the Australian wool trade. It would transport more than 45,000 bales in its career. It survived a dismasting in the First World War and a terrible fire in 2007. The year before the majority of Cutty Sark’s original fabric had been removed which fortunately meant that, whilst devastating, the fire was nowhere near as destructive as it could have been. Over 90% of the ship’s hull structure is original to 1869. Today it's home to the world’s biggest collection of figureheads – the carved wooden figures that adorn ships’ prows – thanks to a bequest by an eccentric maritime history lover.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51274/512746c6d031fc1f778bb5ebad794b08dae52d8e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcc87/bcc876133efe8b0dbe4b87f5b3f14fc98e2581ce" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ed6b/0ed6b793349e8ccf86b3514aaa95934563237b5c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b752/1b7527367e97ed0db94444d80420148b36013336" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eac5c/eac5cd66843ba230a4bccd07a695705a2167a12f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51664/51664c85b1a5c2533cd77e20491674fb93086ce1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/681c1/681c12d74faeb9c5ecdccc72138b98cc40c2841c" alt=""
Drake above the atrium with a Supermarine Spitfire MK.IA.
One of the Nazi eagles Soviet troops captured after the conquest of Berlin,
a
bronze work of Kurt Schmid-Ehmen from the Reichskanzlei which can be
seen today at the Imperial War Museum after the British were given it by
the Soviets in 1946, shown here with Drake Winston. One of the central
symbols of the power of Hitler was the dismantled building complex of
the New and Old Reich Chancellery and the Palais Borsig from 1949 to
1953 under orders of the Soviet Control Commission. After 1945 the use
of saline marble (a red limestone and a petrographic sense
not a genuine marble) was used and it was reported that floor and wall
claddings of the New Reich Chancellery were reused for the foyers of the
Humboldt University and the Old Palais, the Mohrenstraße underground
station and the Soviet memorials at Treptow Park, Tiergarten and
Schönholzer Heide although there is no direct proof for this. Roberto
Rossellini's 1947 film Deutschland im Jahre Null have scenes in
the ruins of the New Reichskanzlei in which it can be seen that the
floor coverings have already been removed in the area of the
Marmorgalerie. During the foundation work for new buildings on the
corner of Vossstraße and Ebertstrasse, the fragments of former window
sections or roof cornices were recovered in February 2008. Today a panel
of the Foundation's Topography of Terror recalls the building. The
subsoil was rebuilt with multi-storey flat construction during the East German era.
In the street corner of the ground floor is now a Chinese restaurant.
Greenwich
View
of Queens House and Canary Wharf from Greenwich Park. Due to its
commanding views over the River Thames, the Isle of Dogs and the City of
London, Simon Jenkins rated the view of the Royal Hospital with Canary
Wharf in the distance as one of the top ten in England.
At the northern edge is the National Maritime Museum and Queen's House,
and beyond those Greenwich Hospital. To the east is Vanbrugh Castle. To
the south is Blackheath and in the south western corner is the Ranger's
House, looking out over the heath. The park was landscaped in the 17th
century with the public first allowed into the park during the 18th
century. Samuel Johnson visited the park in 1763 and commented "Is it
not fine?" As seen in the comparison views, the park has undergone
numerous changes, including the loss in the 1970s of many trees due to
Dutch Elm Disease. According to the 1812 tree survey, nearly half the
trees were elm, but by 1976 only 44 remained and all of these had gone
by 1999. In 1993 the Royal Parks Agency was established and given
executive responsibility for managing and policing the Royal Parks,
including Greenwich. In 1997 the whole park, along with neighbouring
properties and part of the town centre, was inscribed onto UNESCO's list
of World Heritage Sites for a number principal reasons: as a Royal Park
enjoyed and modified by kings, notably Henry VIII, James I and Charles
II; it forms the setting for a large number of listed buildings, most
importantly Inigo Jones's Queen's House (now part of the National
Maritime Museum) and Christopher Wren's Flamsteed House; the original
Royal Observatory for the outstanding interest of some of its designed
landscape elements such as the parterre and giant steps, an
inter-related pair of garden earthworks, which form legible remains of
the core of one of the earliest great formal gardens in the French
style; as the setting of a scheduled Roman temple and a scheduled group
of Anglo-Saxon barrows, on a ridge overlooking the River Thames; and as
part of the ensemble of historic features that contribute to the
international significance of the maritime and royal heritage of the
Maritime Greenwich World Heritage Site.
Drake
in the Octagon Room at Flamsteed House and as it appears in plate 2
from Ichnographia speculae Regiae Grenovici exquisite facta, a series of engravings commissioned by Sir Jonas Moore in 1676,
mathematician and patron of astronomy was elected a Fellow of the Royal
Society in 1674 and the leading force in the construction and equipping
of the original
Royal Greenwich Observatory. The engraving itself shows three
astronomers at work, one at a table making notes whilst two others use a
quadrant and a refracting telescope to view the sky through open
windows. At the back of the room are three inset clocks including the
pair of timekeeping instruments made by Thomas Tompion for the
observatory on the instruction of Sir Jonas Moore. These clocks are now
in the British Museum and at the Royal Greenwich Observatory. Above them
are portraits of Charles II and James, Duke of York, later James II.
The plate bears the inscription: "PROSPECTUS INTRA CAMERAM STELLATAM".
The room was created by Sir Christopher Wren as part of his original
Royal Observatory design, commissioned by Charles II.
It was designed so that the Astronomer Royal could observe celestial
events in the night sky. It's a rare example of a Christopher Wren
designed interior. For this reason, the room has huge windows but the
positioning of Flamsteed House was not ideal given that none of
the walls was aligned with a meridian meaning positional observations
were not possible.However, the Octagon Room remains of historical
importance because it is one of the few Christopher Wren-designed
interiors that one can see in London today.
Drake looking at the bright red Time Ball atop the Royal Observatory's Octagon Room of Flamsteed House, which is one of the world's earliest public time signals, first used in 1833 and still operating today. Every day at 12.55 the time ball rises half way up its mast. At 12.58 it rises all the way to the top. At 13.00 exactly the ball falls, providing a signal to anyone who happens to be looking. The reason why noon had not been chosen was because astronomers at the observatory would record when the Sun crossed the meridian at that time on that day. On the rare occasions where the ball could get stuck due to icing or snow, and if the wind was too high it would not be dropped. In 1852, it was established to distribute a time signal by the telegraph wires also. The time ball was extremely popular with the public, chronometers, railways, mariners, and there was a petition to have another time ball established in Southampton also. Astronomers have long used the Royal Observatory as a basis for measurement. Four separate meridians have passed through the buildings, defined by successive instruments. The basis of longitude, the meridian that passes through the Airy transit circle, first used in 1851, was adopted as the world's Prime Meridian at the International Meridian Conference at Washington, D.C. on October 22, 1884 afer which nations across the world used it as their standard for mapping and timekeeping. The Prime Meridian was marked by a brass (later replaced by stainless steel) strip in the Observatory's courtyard once the buildings became a museum in 1960, and, since December 16, 1999, has been marked by a powerful green laser shining north across the London night sky.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74abb/74abb2c043bba2c71dddb1cf608f7d11d1fd88b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c310/9c310dcf56aad0742b3db23cf02e525989c06ff9" alt=""
Drake looking at the bright red Time Ball atop the Royal Observatory's Octagon Room of Flamsteed House, which is one of the world's earliest public time signals, first used in 1833 and still operating today. Every day at 12.55 the time ball rises half way up its mast. At 12.58 it rises all the way to the top. At 13.00 exactly the ball falls, providing a signal to anyone who happens to be looking. The reason why noon had not been chosen was because astronomers at the observatory would record when the Sun crossed the meridian at that time on that day. On the rare occasions where the ball could get stuck due to icing or snow, and if the wind was too high it would not be dropped. In 1852, it was established to distribute a time signal by the telegraph wires also. The time ball was extremely popular with the public, chronometers, railways, mariners, and there was a petition to have another time ball established in Southampton also. Astronomers have long used the Royal Observatory as a basis for measurement. Four separate meridians have passed through the buildings, defined by successive instruments. The basis of longitude, the meridian that passes through the Airy transit circle, first used in 1851, was adopted as the world's Prime Meridian at the International Meridian Conference at Washington, D.C. on October 22, 1884 afer which nations across the world used it as their standard for mapping and timekeeping. The Prime Meridian was marked by a brass (later replaced by stainless steel) strip in the Observatory's courtyard once the buildings became a museum in 1960, and, since December 16, 1999, has been marked by a powerful green laser shining north across the London night sky.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eea7/2eea7cfd0f14566637a3e658041c46472020577b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b656e/b656e0474f7538ffefd5226b84a707aa33df690a" alt=""
Drake
in front of Harrison's first sea clock (H1) which took Harrison five
years to build before demonstrated it to members of the Royal Society
who spoke on his behalf to the Board of Longitude which had overseen a
system of inducement prizes offered by the British government through an Act of Parliament (the Longitude Act) in 1714 for
a simple and practical method for the precise determination of a ship's
longitude at sea. This particular clock was the first proposal that the
Board considered to be worthy of a sea trial. In 1736, Harrison sailed
to Lisbon on HMS Centurion under the command of Captain George Proctor
and returned on HMS Orford after Proctor died at Lisbon on October 4,
1736. The clock lost time on the outward voyage but had performed well
on the return trip- both the captain and the sailing master of the
Orford praised the design. The master noted that his own calculations
had placed the ship sixty miles east of its true landfall which had been
correctly predicted by Harrison using H1. Although not the
transatlantic voyage demanded by the Board of Longitude, but the Board
was impressed enough to grant Harrison £500 for further development.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/633ee/633ee1c0c9cb799de1e6c5af37982c037c579f7c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40447/40447da8b6a5144ffd9c7f1046e8bee5cc21f65e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7268/e726825a13af0869d725badd4408478bd593423e" alt=""
At Abbey Road back in the 1990s